The “TOOL” of a Massacre, Will the REAL James Holmes Please Stand UP?

by MJ RichardsonJuly 21, 2012

As we all know by now, in the early morning hours of July 20, 2012, police responded to what can only be described as a massacre. Within hours of the reports coming in, the Mainstream Media, in particular ABC News with Stephanopoulos and Ross began to use their Liberal Biased attack style Journalism to fire their own shots at one particular political group. I do apologize for the tasteless pun, however, there is no better way to explain exactly what they did.

First, let us look at the exchange between the MSM giants:

Stephanolpoulos: I’m going to go to Brian Ross. You’ve been investigating the background of Jim Holmes here. You found something that might be significant.

Ross: There’s a Jim Holmes of Aurora, Colorado, page on the Colorado Tea party site as well, talking about him joining the Tea Party last year. Now, we don’t know if this is the same Jim Holmes. But it’s Jim Holmes of Aurora, Colorado.

Stephanolpoulos: Okay, we’ll keep looking at that. Brian Ross, thanks very much.

With that stated, ABC News later apologized in a feeble attempt at damage control, but the damage was already done. All of their early morning listeners had left for work. In cubicles, retail outlets, construction sites, board rooms, and on sidewalks all around this great Nation, their words had begun a destructive chain of events.

People everywhere were talking about it!

“OMG! Did you hear what the Tea Party did last night?”

What these so-called Journalists did is the OPPOSITE of what Journalists are hired to do! The media world has forgotten what it is to “fact check” PRIOR to reporting. And their “apologies” about misinformation are just as tasteless as the false reporting. These men KNEW the seed they were planting. THEY turned the events perpetrated by this evil man into a POLITICAL attack against their opponents. And they just KNEW, that they finally had SOMETHING to use against the Tea Party.

Well, the FACT is, no one, not ONE SINGLE ACT OF CRIMINALITY has ever been attributed to the Tea Party, or the Patriots affiliated with them, or what the Liberal Media and their friends in government have called “extremists” and “terrorists”. NOT ONE!

Stephanopoulos, Ross, and the Liberal Leaning ABC News thought they finally had an ace in the hole.. And then? The hole they created, caved in!

The FACTS are: James Holmes is a registered Democrat. James Holmes is affiliated with Occupy Black Bloc. His associates say he is an avid Obama supporter.

 

 Now, with that out of the way, let’s talk about “why is THIS significant?” But first, we here at The Revolution Road would like to issue the following statement:

   The events in Aurora Colorado are tragic and this massacre ended, changed, and hurt the lives of many. Our thoughts and prayers should be with all involved and all injured, including the families. We are publishing this article because it is TIME sensitive. And you will find out why shortly.

 This massacre coincides with a pivotal point in American History. Now I am not prepared to spout conspiracy theories and ill wills of our present government and administration, however, I will list some facts, and ask of my readers to ascertain and formulate their own opinions concerning the matter. You see, on July 27, 2012, Secretary of State Hilary Clinton has promised to sign the United Nation Small Arms Treaty. And President Barack Hussein Obama will sign it as well IF the US Senate votes to ratify by 2/3 vote. Until yesterday, the Treaty would have failed to pass the Senate. Now, with the events that transpired at the theater in Aurora, Colorado, it may just have enough support to be ratified!

This treaty — which would also mandate creation of a national collection agency for those guns and is contrary to the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment — has the long-standing and enthusiastic backing  of the Obama State Department, headed by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

“Conventional arms transfers are a crucial national security concern for the United States, and we have always supported effective action to control the international transfer of arms,” Hillary Clinton noted  as early as October 14, 2009. Clinton boasted that “the United States regularly engages other states to raise their standards and to prohibit the transfer or transshipment of capabilities to rogue states, terrorist groups, and groups seeking to unsettle regions.” Of course, that speech was delivered at the same time the Obama administration was transferring some 2,000 small arms to Mexican drug gangs in the “Fast and Furious” gun-walking scandal .

The draft  of the treaty prepared earlier this year by the UN Preparatory Committee (PrepCom) explains that the treaty is aimed at crime control as well as rogue militias in developing nations:

The majority of conflict deaths are caused by the use of small arms, and civilian populations bear the brunt of armed conflict more than ever. Also, small arms are the dominant tools of criminal violence.

The PrepCom report  of February 2012 — despite protestations by the Hillary Clinton’s minions — is not limited merely to international transfer of firearms. The draft treaty covers “transfers” as well as imports and exports of firearms:

The international transactions or activities covered by this Treaty include those listed below and defined in Annex A:

(a) Import;

(b) Export;

(c) Transfer…

In this matter, the 2012 conference is merely following the goals of the 2001 UN Programme of Action on small arms, which required national gun registries and collection agencies for those guns once they’ve been registered. The 2001 Programme of Action requires nations:

To ensure that comprehensive and accurate records are kept for as long as possible on the manufacture, holding and transfer of small arms and light weapons under their jurisdiction. These records should be organized and maintained in such a way as to ensure that accurate information can be promptly retrieved and collated by competent national authorities.

To develop and implement, where possible, effective disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programmes, including the effective collection, control, storage and destruction of small arms and light weapons…

The UN is still seeking this kind of broad control over private firearms ownership, and UN General Assembly resolution 66/47 , adopted December 2, 2011 in advance of this month’s conference that it seeks to ban “The illicit trade in small arms and light weapons in all its aspects.” [Emphasis added]

Moreover, the 2012 PrepCom report  uses broad bans on any transfer of firearms:

A State Party shall not authorize a transfer of conventional arms if there is a substantial risk that those conventional arms would: Be used in a manner that would seriously undermine peace and security or provoke, prolong or aggravate internal, regional, subregional or international instability.

Some 56 or more U.S. senators have written a letter to President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton opposing the UN global gun registry, according to the National Rifle Association. Senatorial opposition began with a July 26, 2011 letter claiming  that “the establishment of any sort of international gun registry that could impede upon the privacy rights of law-abiding gun owners is a non-starter.” That number of Senators will likely get smaller after the events of July 20th…

The U.S. State Department already has a State Department Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement  that could be used as a control agency for domestic controls on firearms transfers.

If America signs this treaty, then America is under the same provisions and restrictions as the rest of the nations under UN “Guidance”… And THAT is unacceptable. It is a direct violation of  the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution as well as the DICK Act of 1902. So with the recent events in Florida and now in Colorado, and with the NAACP, along with Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, backed by Obama and Clinton, pushed by Pelosi and Reid, and riding on the emotions of America’s people and their elected officials, and UN ban of firearms is MORE LIKELY THAN EVER.

The Massacre in Aurora is and will play a HUGE roll in the UN’s desire to control firearms in the United States. But why? Because an unarmed Nation is a controllable Nation, and a very VULNERABLE Nation indeed.

“You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.” is a quote by Isoroku Yamamoto, Commander-in-Chief of the Imperial Japanese Navy during World War II.

Even Forbes published a piece concerning the UN Small Arms Treaty over a year ago, http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2011/06/07/u-n-agreement-should-have-all-gun-owners-up-in-arms/

and again two weeks ago: http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2012/07/10/the-u-n-arms-trade-treaty-are-our-2nd-amendment-rights-part-of-the-deal/

And the most frightening portrayal of the Treaty comes DIRECTLY from the UN itself!

From 2-27 July, all countries of the world are coming together in New York to negotiate what is seen as the most important initiative ever regarding conventional arms regulation within the United Nations. A robust arms trade treaty can make a difference for millions of people confronted with insecurity, deprivation and fear.

http://www.un.org/disarmament/

It is NOT a “Conspiracy Theory” to believe that there is a socialist machine grinding away at America and the Constitution which sets the United States apart from every other Nation on Earth.

America was forged by men with firearms in hand, and America will be retained and even restored by men and women with weapons in hand. NO Constitution loving Patriot will EVER relinquish his/her firearms. Liberty was NEVER granted to us by the Constitution. Liberty is a BIRTHRIGHT! And telling ANY one of us that our Liberty to possess, own, modify, use, carry, buy, trade, or gift away our firearms will surely be met with the heart and soul of a True American Patriot.

“GIVE ME LIBERTY, OR GIVE ME DEATH!” 

Advertisements